|
|
|
Capital Plan & Gaming
|
|
House Democrats Unveil New
Plan
This week the House Democrats
unveiled new gaming legislation.
The plan adds two casinos,
including one in Chicago, and
thousands of slot machines at
riverboats and horse tracks. It
also proposed reissuing the
state's 10th casino license,
approved for Rosemont in 1999.
Where Does the Money Go?
- 70% of all
revenues would go toward a capital
program. Those dollars would be
divided up by the following: 40%
for roads, bridges, transit and
local projects, and 60% for building
schools, parks, cultural
institutions and museum projects.
- 30% of all
revenues would be dedicated to
education
- 20% of all
the education revenues would be
directed to Chicago Public Schools
- Of the
remaining, 50% would go to needy
school districts
- 30%
distributed to schools on a per
capita basis
- 20% to
fast growth districts
- All
funding must be used to reduce class
size, hire reading or math
specialists or hire elementary and
middle school counselors.
- $5 million
would be distributed to compulsive
gambling prevention programs.
-
Cities with
existing riverboats like Elgin would
not get more money from the expanded
gambling. Their share of the take
would be frozen at current levels.
Counties would get 2% of the new
gambling money to use for public
safety or health care spending.
-
Cook County
would get 3% of the revenues from
the Chicago casino to go toward
criminal justice and public health.
-
Cities with
horse tracks would get 2% and
counties 3% of the take from the new
"racino."
How Does the Plan Work
- A new Chicago casino run by
Chicago Casino Development
Authority, whose three members will
be appointed by the mayor. The city
will pay $200 million to the state
for the casino license.
- The unused 10th casino license
and one new license would be
auctioned off for use anywhere in
Illinois but must be on water.
- Existing casinos get access to
3,500 new gambling spots at a cost
of $50,000 per machine. Spots can be
on land.
- Horse tracks split 3,600
gambling positions for video poker
and slot machines with Arlington
Park getting at least 1,100.
The cost is $50,000 per gambling
machine spot.
Ethics and Oversight
- Existing Illinois Gaming Board
abolished and replaced with expanded
panel whose members undergo greater
scrutiny and given greater power.
Illinois House members are being
summoned back to the Capitol for a
possible vote on Dec. 17 and told to
prepare for more than one overnight
stay. A Senate spokeswoman said
Senate sessions are "possible."
What Is Being Said About the
Plan
House Speaker Madigan
said gambling has become the last resort
for funding construction and education
and bailing out the Chicago region's bus
and train agencies before a financial
"doomsday" early next year.
"In light of this
reality, and particularly out of a
strong desire to see the unseemly drama
over mass transit in northeastern
Illinois that has played out over the
last six months brought to a conclusion,
I am willing to embrace compromise and
offer a sincere, serious proposal that
will receive my full support and
backing," Madigan said in a letter to
members of the General Assembly.
This plan is sure to be
controversial. There are already
differences on provisions intended
to alter how women and minorities
gain access to ownership share of
the new casinos.
The House plan allows any minority
or woman who invests $5,000, to
help pick the actual investors. Some
like the previous system, which
required women and minorities to
have significant wealth and the
ability to be a part of the
ownership applications for the
casino license.
Also at issue is how
much Chicago should pay for a gambling
license. Early estimates said the
license could be worth $800 million,
while city officials said any fee would
be too much. This plan calls for a $200
million payment to the state.
Additionally, aside from
the Chicago casino, there's no specific
site named for the other two licenses.
Senate President Jones has long sought a
casino for the South suburbs, others
want a casino in the Northern suburbs.
The Link to Mass Transit
Many downstate legislators want a
capital bill before they will vote
on mass transit funding. Last week a
transit funding bill died because
many downstate representatives
believed if they solved Chicago
transit, a statewide capital
bill would never be passed. A
transit funding bill needs downstate
support to pass the General Assembly
so downstate legislators are
leveraging their power to tie the
two together.
Making the
situation even more complicated is
that a lack of trust in Springfield
has left many legislators to worry
that funding will be withheld for
capital projects in their district.
Read testimony
given in May 2005 by
economist Dr. Victor Matheson to
the Illinois General Assembly on
the fiscal impact of riverboat
gaming. Dr. Matheson claims,
among others things, that gaming
would generate far less money
than current speculations
suggest and there are important
social costs to consider when
reviewing a gaming expansion
proposal (such as increased
crime and pathological gambling
disorders).
Read the
latest
Illinois
Gaming Board Annual Report, 2006.
Commission on
Government Forecasting and
Accountability report on gaming
revenues,
Wagering
in Illinois: 2007 Update.
Commission on
Government Forecasting and
Accountability report,
Discussion on
Riverboat Gambling in Illinois
(2005) -
complete with state by state
comparisons.
|
|
Mass Transit Funding
|
|
|
No Progress As Another "Doomsday" Looms
SB 307 or anything
like it is bad public policy because it
creates a hole in the budget without
providing a stable revenue source to
fill the gap.
SB 307 would have created a $385 million
hole. The bill would have diverted the
revenues collected from the sales tax on
motor fuel in the six county transit
region to the Regional Transit
Authority. Those revenues already go
toward funding other state services.
Another bill that
was voted down is SB 572. it created a
new revenue source for transit by
raising the sales tax in the six county
transit regions. Several legislators
and the Governor indicated that they
could not support the legislation
because it raised taxes and did not
include provisions for a state capital
bill. However, SB 572 is a
regional solution to a regional
problem.
(Read an
analysis of SB 572 here).
There is no
telling when a transit funding solution
will occur. Speaker Madigan has
indicated he would like to vote on a
capital and transit funding package next
week, however there is talk that a
capital plan will not be ready by next
week.
If a plan is not
approved by December 31, agreements by
the transit unions to decrease CTA
personnel retirement benefits, in
exchange for a long-term CTA funding
solution, will expire. The General
Assembly will have missed a huge
opportunity for cost reductions if that
is allowed to happen.
If a solution is
not agreed upon by Jan 20 the CTA will
eliminate 81 bus routes, lay off 2,400
employees and raise fares as high as
$3.25 for rail passengers who pay with
cash.
Low Income People Affected More by
Fare Hikes Than Tax Increase
It is important to realize the
impact of higher transit fares
on low income people. Low
income people tend to rely more
on public transit than wealthy.
According to the United States
Department of Transportation,
the availability of
public transportation is
particularly important to people
with limited incomes. Also,
that bus service is relatively
more important than rail service
at lower income levels.
The chart below, also from the
United States Department of
Transportation, shows that most
public transit riders are low
and middle income. In fact,
those that have incomes under
$20,000 make up over 50% of all
public transit riders.
(Read the full report here).
How Do Fare Changes
Affect People?
The Transit Cooperative Research
Program found that most fare
changes have affected ridership
of lower income groups.(Read
the full report here).
Additionally, analysis of data
from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Consumer Expenditure
Report finds that low and middle
income people spend more of a
percentage of their income on
public transit than wealthy. In
fact, the lowest income group
spent almost twice the amount of
the wealthiest, when measured as
a percentage of income.
|
Quintile |
Lowest |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
Highest |
|
Income Before Taxes |
$9,676 |
$25,546 |
$42,622 |
$67,813 |
$147,737 |
|
% of
Income Spent on
Public
Transportation |
1.4% |
0.8% |
0.7% |
0.7% |
0.8% |
Fare Hikes Will
Hurt More Than Increased
Sales Tax
Analysis of the Bureau of
Labor Statistic (BLS) data
shows that the increase in
the sales tax rate proposed
in SB 572 (0.25%) would
impact low and middle income
people less than an increase
in rail and bus fare would.
The data shows, that even if
Illinois taxed 100% of
expenditures,
(Illinois currently only
taxes about 13% of the
economy) the lowest and
middle income groups would
be hurt more by the
proposed fare increases than
the proposed sales tax
increase.
For example, the average
train rider will see their
cost go up by $1 per ride
during peak hours. That
means about $40 a month or
almost $500 a year. The
average bus rider will see
about half that increase as
fares will go up by $0.50
during peak hours.
At the same time, based on
the BLS data, the lowest
income group would pay an
additional $50 per year and
middle incomes about $100
per year in sales taxes if
SB 572 passes. Far less
than what they would pay
under SB 572.
|
Quintile |
Lowest |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
Highest |
|
Average Annual Expenditure |
$19,120 |
$28,921 |
$39,098 |
$54,354 |
$90,469 |
|
What
a 0.25% Increase in the
Sales Tax Would Cost |
$48 |
$72 |
$98 |
$136 |
$226 |
Resources:
|
|
FY 2008 Budget |
|
Waiting on Governor to Sign BIMP
The Governor
still has not signed the Budget
Implementation Bill or "BIMP" into
law.
SB 783 House Amendment 5
or the "BIMP" was passed by the
General Assembly on November 2nd.
The Governor received the
BIMP bill on Nov. 5 and has
60 days to act on the bill
or it automatically becomes
law. His office state's
that the Governor is still
reviewing the legislation
and that "there could be a
way to actually put more
money into education."
Meanwhile, schools, health care and
human services are still waiting for
their FY 2008 budget appropriation
and in some cases, have lost funding
for the year.
While local school districts can
receive
their increased FY 2008 payments
retroactively, many human service
providers rely on Medicaid funding,
which can only be paid
prospectively.
That means programs like those that
serve seniors and
the developmentally disabled lose
funding every day the
Governor waits to sign the BIMP
legislation.
|
|
Revenue Update |
|
|
November Revenues Continue to Lag Inflation
Overall receipts
in November were down $26 million from
the same point last year as reported by
the Illinois Commission on Government
Forecasting and Accountability (COGFA).
Revenue
sources that dropped last month include:
- Federal
transfers declined $41 million
- Corporate
income taxes fell $35 million (in large
part to a computer system conversion)
- Public utility
taxes declined $25 million
- Corporate
franchise taxes declined by $2 million
- Vehicle use
tax declined by $1 million
- Riverboat
gambling was down $10 million
- Lottery
transfers dipped $5 million
- Other sources
and transfers were down $10 million
Some Collections Up Last Month
Luckily collections from the personal
income tax performed well, up $39 million
net of refunds. Estate taxes also were up
$32 million. After months of decline,
receipts from the sales tax were up $13
million. Other taxes that experienced
revenue gains in November were the insurance
tax ($9 million), interest income ($7
million) and liquor tax ($1 million).
Year to Date
Through the first five months of
Fiscal Year 2008, overall receipts
are up $478 million. However, most
of that is due to an increase of
$303 million in federal sources.
State revenues are only up $175
million through the first five
months.
Major
sources of revenue are mixed.
Personal income taxes continue to do
well, up $229 million. However
corporate income taxes are down $63
million and sales taxes down $45
million.
After
accounting for inflation state
sources are down $125 million from
this same point last year.
To read the entire
November monthly briefing from COGFA
click here.
For more
information on taxes and revenues
contact Chrissy Mancini at
cmancini@ctbaonline.org
or visit the
budget, tax and revenue section of the
CTBA website
here.
|
|
The Illinois Economy |
|
|
Holiday Sales & Economic Indicators
Holiday sales are
extremely important for the overall
economy's health. Consumer spending
accounts for about two-thirds of total
spending in the economy, and holiday
sales make up about 20% of all industry
sales for the entire year. This year,
holiday sales are even more important
for the health of the economy because of
the deterioration of the housing market
combined with high energy prices and
declines in the stock market.
According to the
National Retail Federation, holiday
sales are expected to rise this year by
4.0%, a drop from last year's 4.6% and
the lowest gain since 2002.
The Role of the Internet and
Tax Collections
Consumers are expected to use the
internet for about 30% of their
holiday shopping this year. Most
internet sales are not subject to
the sales tax, meaning the state
will continue to lose revenue as
more consumers look toward the
convenience of the internet to do
their shopping.
Illinois Economic Indicators
The unemployment rate for October
rose 0.2% over September and is up
by 1.2% from this time last year.
|
|
Oct-07 |
Sep-07 |
Oct-06 |
|
Unemployment Rate |
5.3% |
5.1% |
4.1% |
| |
October |
% Change
Over Prior Month |
% Change
Over a Year Ago |
|
Single
Family Housing Permits |
2,150 |
18.1% |
-30.9% |
|
Civilian
Labor Force |
6,739 |
-0.3% |
1.1% |
|
Employment |
6,383 |
-0.5% |
-0.1% |
For more
information see pages 1-3 of the COGFA
November monthly report
here.
|
|
Calendar of Events |
|
WHAT?
Making the Connection Basic
Training
WHEN?
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
WHERE?
Naperville, IL
Presented by the DuPage Federation
on Human Services the session
contains practical information in an
easy to understand format regarding
many programs available to assist
low income persons.
Register Here
WHAT?
Making the Connection: Public
Benefits and Single Adults & Public
Benefits for Youths up to 21
WHEN?
March 5,
2008
WHERE?
Naperville, IL
Presented by the DuPage Federation
on Human Services
Register Here
WHAT?
Making the Connection: Mental Health
and Public Benefits & Understanding
Spenddown
WHEN? March
6, 2008
WHERE?Naperville,
IL
Presented by the DuPage Federation
on Human Services
Register Here
WHAT?
Understanding Appeals & Domestic
Violence and Public Benefits
WHEN?
March
18, 2008
WHERE?Naperville,
IL
Presented by the DuPage Federation
on Human Services
Register Here
WHAT?
Immigrants and Public Benefits &
Putting the Pieces Together
WHEN?
March 19,
2008
WHERE?Naperville,
IL
Presented by the DuPage Federation
on Human Services
Register Here
WHAT?
Making the Connection Basic Training
WHEN?
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
WHERE?
Naperville, IL
Presented by the DuPage Federation
on Human Services the session
contains practical information in an
easy to understand format regarding
many programs available to assist
low income persons.
Register Here
|
|
Do you have something to share in
the Weekly Review?
Please email Chrissy Mancini
|
|
|